I would say that there are many, many other sites now that are going to continue to carry the torch of journalism. In that sense, the world is not losing anything. ![]() On the other hand, a part of me feels like, OK, karma is a bitch. I think the punishment went too far, possibly. It was almost like watching a movie about a website. So I don't know if legally it deserved that. I feel sorry for him in some ways.ĭo you believe they deserved this extreme verdict? I don't think in his heart he really wanted to be. But on the other hand, I feel sorry for Nick because I know he never meant to be the bully that he ended up becoming to so many people. Obviously, there's that high school petty side of me that wants to cheer in some ways. How do you feel about Gawker shutting down? (Sample headline: "Laurel Touby's Inability to Use the Internet Creates Mayhem") These responses were all provided to Newsweek via email or phone interviews, except for the tweets, obviously, which were tweeted on Twitter.įounder of, venture investor The one thing all of these individuals have in common is that they have been the subject of unflattering Gawker coverage, whether deserved or not. Some of them are gleefully dancing on Gawker's grave, while others shared more nuanced reactions or concerns about press freedom. Some of them are intimately involved with Manhattan media, others not at all. So we reached out to several dozen notable Gawker targets over the years and asked for their thoughts about its demise. The blog officially ceased operations this week, after losing a high-profile legal battle against Hulk Hogan. Despite the scoops it landed and the formidable media talent it nurtured, there is no better measure of Gawker's impact than the vast number of famous or quasi-famous people it pissed off over its 13-year career. Gawker made a lot of them: billionaires, media personalities, world-famous wrestlers, right-wing ideologues, random mini-celebrities. Updated | How do you measure Gawker's legacy?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |